As ICF coaches, we’re encouraged to engage in supervision, mentoring and reflective practice. The tricky part is that these terms often get used interchangeably, even though they serve quite different purposes.

Here’s a simple way to think about the differences, without over complicating it.

If you’re wondering…Individual coaching supervisionGroup coaching supervisionCoach mentoring
What is this mainly for?Making sense of your coaching work, your reactions, and what’s happening in the coaching relationshipReflecting on your coaching with the added richness of hearing other coaches’ perspectivesImproving your coaching skills by drawing on someone else’s experience
StructureOne-to-one, confidential, spacious, and tailored to your needsSmall group with clear boundaries, confidentiality, and facilitated reflectionOne-to-one or group, often more directive and instructional
Where does the attention go?On you as the coach, your clients, and the ethical and relational dynamics at playOn your work and others’ work, noticing patterns and shared challengesOn skills, tools, approaches, and how to do things “well” closely aligned to the ICF Core Competencies
What does it sound like in practice?“Something about this client is really sticking with me.”

“I’m not sure what I’m missing here.”

“I’m noticing this pattern in myself or my counterparts.”
“When you said that, it reminded me of a client I work with.”

“I notice a pattern emerging.”

“Here’s where I’m getting stuck.”
“How would you handle this?”

“What questions work well in this situation?”

“How do I get better at core competency?”
How directive is it?Very light. As supervisor I hold the space and support reflection rather than offering answersLight to moderate. Insight comes from dialogue rather than adviceHigher. The mentor offers guidance, suggestions, and examples
What’s the relationship like?Collaborative and reflective. I’m alongside you, not above youPeer learning with a supervisor creating safety and structureMore focus on technical skills at than supervision.
How does this connect to ICF standards?Strongly aligned. Supervision supports ethical practice, self-awareness, and use of the ICF Core CompetenciesAlso aligned. Ethics and competencies are explored through shared reflectionOften used to support skill development or credential requirements or renewal
When is it most useful?When your work feels complex, sticky, emotionally charged, or ethically unclearWhen you want perspective, connection, and to reduce the isolation of coachingWhen you’re building confidence, capability, or working towards a credential
What do coaches often get from it?Greater clarity, confidence, resilience, and ethical groundingNormalisation, broader insight, and learning from others’ experiencesPractical learning, faster skill development, and reassurance
What it is notNot therapy, not performance management, not advice-givingNot group coaching, not training, not peer problem-solvingNot reflective supervision or a substitute for supervision
What does it cost and how do I book?Individual supervisionGroup SupervisionMentoring

A helpful way to think about it

Many ICF coaches use mentoring and supervision at different times and for different reasons.

Mentoring helps you learn skills that improve how you coach.
Supervision helps you stay well, ethical, and aware as a coach.

As your experience grows, supervision often becomes less about fixing problems and more about deepening your presence, judgment, and professional maturity.

Still working out what kind of support is right for you?

If you’re weighing up supervision and mentoring, you’re already doing thoughtful professional work. The right choice often depends on where you are in your coaching journey and what’s showing up in your practice right now.

A short conversation can help you sense what would be most useful. Individual supervision, group supervision, mentoring, or a combination over time.

Book a clarity conversation to talk it through and decide what best supports your coaching and your clients.